The Sages in Tractate Megillah present two opinions regarding King Achashverosh. One argues that Achashverosh was foolish, while the other asserts that he was actually a wise king.
At first glance, this debate is difficult to understand. Throughout the Megillah, we encounter numerous decisions made by King Achashverosh, each of which could be seen as both wise and foolish—just as in any decision we make in life.
For example, at the beginning of the Megillah, Achashverosh’s decision to hold a grand feast for all his officials, servants, and people in order to establish his rule could be considered wise—when the people are happy, they generally support their king. However, this decision could also be seen as foolish, as it relies solely on a form of political bribery, raising the question of what will happen when the money runs out.
Similarly, the attempt to summon Vashti and display her before the nobles and officials—especially according to the Sages’ interpretation that Vashti was none other than the granddaughter of Nebuchadnezzar, the great ruler—could be seen as a wise move, as it positioned Achashverosh as the true successor of the mighty Babylonian empire. However, it could also be seen as foolish, as it exposed his weak standing—if he needed his wife to bolster his legitimacy, it implied that his own status was precarious.
Perhaps the debate is not whether Achashverosh was truly wise or foolish—something difficult to assess based solely on his actions—but rather where the greater sanctification of God’s name lay. Was it more remarkable that a wise king like Achashverosh, despite his intelligence, was ultimately led by God to facilitate the salvation of the Jewish people, even though he initially aligned himself with Haman’s plans for their destruction?
Or perhaps the greater sanctification of God’s name occurred through a foolish king, whose decisions were unpredictable and based on whims, yet who was still divinely guided to bring about the salvation of the Jewish people.
A similar dynamic seems to unfold with Esther and Mordechai. When Achashverosh sends out a royal decree to gather young women for the king, all come willingly except for Esther, about whom it is written, “And Esther was taken.” She tries to hide but is taken against her will. She makes every effort not to enhance her appearance and entrusts her fate to Hegai, the king’s eunuch in charge of the women—unlike the other candidates, who request all kinds of cosmetics and perfumes. Yet paradoxically, this very approach makes her more favored than all the others.
It seems that the more Esther tries to escape her fate, the more she increases her chances of becoming queen.
If this is the case, what distinguishes Achashverosh and Haman from Esther and Mordechai? If all of them are mere instruments in God’s plan—whether wise or foolish—then is there any difference between them?
The critical distinction appears to be that while King Achashverosh continues to act as though he is in control, even as he is unwittingly advancing exactly the course that God intended, Mordechai recognizes the divine hand and consciously chooses to become part of the process. He transitions from passivity to active engagement, as seen in his words to Esther: “And who knows if it was for this moment that you attained royalty…”
Mordechai acknowledges that although they did not seek their positions, if they have arrived at this juncture, it must mean they have a mission to fulfill. In this way, he takes control of his destiny—not by resisting God’s will, but by embracing it and acting accordingly.
The holiday of Purim is named after the “Pur,” the lot cast by Haman, which represents randomness and fate. However, the plural form “Purim” also resembles the word “purya,” referring to a royal canopy or seat, symbolizing wisdom and sovereignty.
This duality is reflected in the famous phrase: “A person is obligated to become intoxicated on Purim until he does not know the difference between ‘Cursed is Haman’ and ‘Blessed is Mordechai.’” The term “לבסומי” (to become intoxicated) represents the randomness and chaos of fate. However, only after accepting reality as divine will does one reach the state of “פוריא” (purya)—wisdom and sovereignty. At this point, one becomes the master of their own fate, regardless of whether the situation appears as a blessing or a curse. By choosing to align with God’s will instead of resisting it, one brings order to randomness and gains control over their destiny.
We live in a time of great uncertainty since the outbreak of war. But if Purim teaches us anything, it is to embrace reality as divine will rather than attempt to escape it. By doing so, we can turn our circumstances into an opportunity, consciously leading the way toward God’s redemption and salvation.
Purim Sameach!
For comments: ashersabag77@gmail.com
